Please note: The FaRM Field Trials submission form and instructions will be available on this webpage on November 2, 2026.
The deadline for submissions is November 23, 2026.
Subscribe to the FaRM Newsletter to receive a notification when submissions open.
Request for proposals: FaRM Field Trials
Launched by Farmers for Climate Solutions in 2022, the Farm Resilience Mentorship (FaRM) Program supports farmers and ranchers in building more resilient and profitable operations through the use of beneficial management practices (BMPs), specifically:
Nitrogen management
Cover cropping
Rotational grazing
By providing producers and advisors with peer-to-peer learning that merges science, economics, and practical experience, FaRM helps producers discover what works, avoid what doesn’t, and adapt BMPs to best fit their operation.
The FaRM Field Trials
The FaRM Field Trials provide funding and guidance for agronomists to work with farmers and ranchers to test BMPs on working farms and ranches across Canada. To date, this program has supported over 70 field trials across Canada.
The program is designed to help overcome real-world barriers to BMP adoption and generate practical, regionally relevant agronomic and economic information. It also develops extension capacity through hands-on experience and mentorship, while encouraging peer-to-peer learning and knowledge sharing among farmers, ranchers, and agricultural professionals.
Through this work, FaRM supports farmers and ranchers to build on-farm resilience, improve soil health, enhance profitability, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Through partnerships with organizations across the country, FaRM has supported over 1,000 in-person and virtual learning events, with farmers and ranchers, agrologists, agronomists, Certified Crop Advisers (CCAs), and agricultural researchers as knowledge sharers at these events. The free program also includes the FaRM Learning Hub, where farmers, ranchers, and agronomists can take online self-directed courses to build their knowledge of how to adapt BMPs to their farm or ranch. So far, FaRM has had over 32,000 farmer and rancher participants across the country, representing over 13 million acres.
Learn details about current and completed Field Trials from across the country.
FaRM Field Trial objectives
Troubleshoot and overcome regional barriers to adopting cover cropping, nitrogen management, and rotational grazing practices that can improve on-farm resilience, soil health, and profitability while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing carbon sequestration.
Build familiarity and confidence with these BMPs among farmers, ranchers, and agricultural professionals through practical, hands-on experience.
Generate regionally relevant on-farm agronomic and economic data to support decision-making.
Encourage peer-to-peer learning and stronger regional and cross-country networks of agricultural professionals, farmers, and ranchers.
The Request for Proposals follows a two-stage process, beginning with a Letter of Intent (LOI). Applicants successful at the LOI stage will be invited to submit a Full Proposal. See the application, selection, and notification process for more information.
Eligibility requirements
This program is primarily intended for Canadian agricultural professionals, such as Professional Agrologists (P.Ag), Agronomes (QC), or Certified Crop Advisers (CCA), however other professionals with relevant experience are welcome to apply.
Applicants must be a Canadian organization, a Canadian citizen, or a permanent resident currently operating and residing in Canada and able to enter into a legally binding agreement.
Applicants must apply in partnership with at least one participating farmer and/or rancher. The project should be producer-led, meaning the barrier to BMP adoption was identified in collaboration with the participating producer(s), who must also be willing to share their experience and learning from the trial.
Field trials must be conducted at field-scale using field-sized equipment on a working farm or ranch that receives the majority of its income from commercial farming practices. Small plot trials, trials using plot-sized equipment, and trials located on research farms are not eligible.
Projects may begin at any time in 2027 and may run for a single season or longer, depending on the nature of the trial. Only expenses incurred after March 4, 2027, are eligible, and funding decisions are not expected until March 4, 2027. The maximum funding available is the same regardless of project duration.
Treatments may include commercially available products, but the trial must address a broader producer-identified BMP adoption-related question. The program does not typically support trials where the primary purpose is product development and testing, product promotion, or generating evidence that would ordinarily be developed by the product manufacturer or supplier.
Additional eligibility requirements may apply depending on the proposed project activities (i.e. accessing additional funding for mentorship purposes, trials that include enhanced efficiency fertilizers). See funding available and frequently asked questions for details.
Funding available
Up to $20,000 per project
Funding can support field trial costs, agronomist wages, producer stipends, analysis, travel, knowledge transfer, and other eligible expenses. Includes all applicable taxes and administrative fees.
Up to $30,000 per project with mentorship component
Projects that include hiring and mentoring a junior agronomist or an agronomist from an underrepresented group in Canadian agriculture may receive up to an additional $10,000, for a total project total of up to $30,000, including applicable taxes and administrative fees.
The additional funding is intended to help grow agricultural extension capacity by supporting eligible wages, training, and mentoring costs that provide the mentee with meaningful, hands-on experience related to the BMP(s) being trialed and/or the on-farm trial process.
A mentee could be one or both of the following:
A junior agronomist is defined as an agronomist who is currently enrolled in, or graduated within the past five years from, a relevant post-secondary program (e.g. crop, animal, soil sciences, etc.).
FCS defines the term underrepresented as: Young agronomists (<35), women agronomists, agronomists with disabilities, Black agronomists, Indigenous agronomists and food providers, agronomists of colour, 2SLGBTQ+ agronomists, and new Canadian agronomists.
The mentee can be a permanent or temporary employee, but must be a new hire as of March 4, 2027 and cannot be an existing employee of the applicant organization or business.
The mentee must be a Canadian citizen or a permanent resident.
The mentee cannot be the lead agronomist or lead investigator on the trial.
Key deliverables
1. Design and execute a field trial
The trial must address a producer-identified regional barrier to adopting cover cropping, nitrogen management, and/or rotational grazing. The experimental design and data collected should be appropriate to the question or challenge the trial is intended to address. Note: Nitrogen management trials may have additional requirements; see the frequently asked questions.
Design a scientifically robust field trial. In the selection process, greater weight will be given to field trials demonstrating scientific rigour (e.g., a trial with four replicates will be weighted more favourably than a split-field trial design).
Record key management and site information needed to interpret the trial, such as field history, crop rotation, planting or seeding dates, fertilizer and manure application history, grazing or harvest dates, weather-related events, and other relevant field activities.
Collect sufficient, relevant data and clearly identify the response variables being measured (e.g., yield, percent cover, feed quality, etc.) to quantify the differences between treatments and ultimately inform trial conclusions. A trial measuring multiple key response variables will be weighted more favourably than a trial that only measures one response variable.
Collect economic data pertinent to the trialled practices (e.g., fertilizer costs, corn price, etc.) which will be used in the partial budget analysis, where the “new practice(s)" should be compared to a control or business-as-usual.
Document the trial with photos throughout the project, including trial establishment, key observations or treatment differences, and the on-farm event. Photos should support trial verification, reporting, and knowledge sharing.
OSCIA has put together a fantastic resource for their ONFARM program called “How to Conduct On-Farm Research Guidebook,” which has great tips that can be useful across multiple regions and production types.
2. Organize an on-farm event
Organize and host an on-farm event (i.e. field day, demonstration, workshop, etc.) featuring the field trial, where regional farmers, ranchers, and agronomists are encouraged to come and see the trial and share their experiences. Peer-to-peer learning should be emphasized at this event.
Share event details (e.g., date, description, flyer, etc.) with FaRM six weeks in advance of the event date so that we can cross-promote it through our regional newsletters, event calendar, and through our regional partner networks.
Include FCS Terms of Use and Privacy Statement in the event registration process and at the events. Event registration support is available through FaRM upon request.
Acknowledge and promote the FaRM Program and Learning Hub at events and in all communications related to this project.
Track and report on event participation and feedback. This must include:
Record the number and type of participants (e.g. producers, agronomists, etc.) at the event.
Conduct a short (four-question), on-site, hand-raising survey of event participants using the questions provided.
Collect email addresses (voluntarily) from participants. Emails will be used by FaRM to administer the voluntary annual FaRM Impact Survey and to subscribe participants to a regional FaRM email newsletter. This survey measures the impact of the FaRM program activities, such as whether the knowledge/experience gained from FaRM events actually resulted in changes in practice. It also collects information on barriers to adoption and identifies other needed supports that inform our work.
3. Field trial report and extension materials
At the end of the trial, submit the completed Field Trial Report and extension materials using the templates and guidance provided by FaRM. The report will be used to share project objectives, data, and outcomes in public formats such as the FaRM Learning Hub, the FCS website, or other FaRM online platforms.
The report must include the following four elements:
A completed report summarizing farm context, trial methodology, results and discussion, practical observations, and lessons learned (e.g., what worked, what didn’t work, what applicants might change in the future, etc.).
As peer-to-peer learning is a cornerstone of the FaRM Program, the report must feature a Producer’s Perspective section. This first-person storytelling can be submitted as an article, video, or audio file. If the trial involves multiple sites with different producers, please provide a Producer’s perspective from each producer.
A partial budget analysis comparing the differences in benefits and costs between the new practice(s) (e.g., cover cropping) and the baseline practice (e.g., not cover cropping). The partial budget analysis lets you consider the net return of adoption or net change in farm income.
Net Return = Change in Benefits - Change in Costs
Some sample partial budget analyses for cover crops are available on the FaRM Learning Hub under the mini-course “Economics of Cover Cropping.”
Photos with captions that document or help to communicate results, observations, or practical understanding. Videos are also welcome.
Additional forms of extension materials are welcomed and encouraged (e.g., a podcast, instructional YouTube video, factsheet, infographic, conference presentations, webinars, etc.). Proposals with additional materials will be weighted more favourably in the review process.
4. Participate in evaluation
FCS values feedback on our programming and, as such, we ask that you and the field trial producer(s) participate in a group reflection hosted by the FaRM team and/or complete a brief survey at the end of the contract.
If the project includes hiring and mentoring a junior agronomist or an agronomist from an underrepresented group, the mentee must complete a brief reflection or evaluation survey at the end of the trial or their employment to help assess the knowledge and skills gained through participating in this program.
Expenses
Eligible expenses
Salaries and wages.
Stipend to cover producer time (suggested $50/hr) or to cover possible crop loss (e.g., in a 0 lbs N/acre control); highly recommended.
Field trial costs (e.g., flags, specialized equipment rental, etc.) and treatment costs (e.g., cover crop seed of new species being tested, etc.).
Some equipment >$500 is eligible with pre-approval by FaRM staff.
Knowledge transfer costs (including venue, audio-visual rentals, supplies, and materials, etc.).
Third-party expenses (soil and tissue testing, feed analysis, custom operator, etc.).
Travel related to field trial (mileage, accommodation).
Ineligible expenses
Capital costs (building improvements, office furniture/equipment, field trial/farm equipment over $500 unless prior approval from FaRM staff, drones, virtual fencing collars, computers, projectors, etc.).
Cash crop seed.
Alcohol.
Finance charges, loan interest payments, bank fees, and charges.
Application, selection and notification process
The Request for Proposals follows a two-stage process, beginning with a Letter of Intent (LOI). Applicants successful at the LOI stage will be invited to submit a Full Proposal.
Stage One: Letter of Intent
The Letter of Intent (LOI) submission form and instructions become available on this webpage on November 2, 2026. Subscribe to the FaRM Newsletter to receive a notification when submissions open.
The deadline for LOI submissions is 11:59 p.m. PT on November 23, 2026.
LOIs are reviewed by FaRM agronomists and scientific advisors based on the following criteria:
Alignment with the FaRM Field Trial objectives and eligibility requirements.
Co-led with a farmer or rancher and clearly identifies a producer-inspired barrier to adoption.
Demonstrates the potential for meaningful impact (e.g., significant greenhouse gas reduction potential, high relevance across significant acreage or production systems, strong peer-to-peer learning opportunities)
Describes an experimental design showing scientific rigour, including clearly defined and appropriate agronomically viable treatments and response variables.
Applicants will be notified by email of the outcome of their LOI by December 3, 2026. Applicants invited to proceed to Stage Two will receive the Full Proposal submission form and instructions at that time.
Stage Two: Full Proposal
Applicants invited to participate in Stage Two must attend a mandatory 20-minute meeting with a FaRM team agronomist. The meeting is intended to help applicants strengthen their trial design, confirm program alignment, and address questions about completing a Full Proposal. Meetings will take place virtually between December 7 and December 10, 2026.
Full proposals must include a project budget (template provided) and Letter(s) of Support from the collaborating farmer(s) or rancher(s).
The deadline for Full Proposal submissions is 11:59 p.m. on PT January 18, 2027.
Full Proposals are reviewed and scored by a regional committee composed of farmers, ranchers, agronomists and other subject-matter experts. The committee may also provide recommendations to strengthen the proposed project, including aspects such as treatment selection, agronomic practices, response variables, experimental design, and knowledge-sharing activities.
Our goal is to notify applicants of decisions by email on or before March 4, 2027, with successful project contracts signed by mid-March.
Sign up for an upcoming Q&A session:
October 21, 2026 – 12-1 pm ET (English only) – Register here
October 22, 2026 – 11-12 pm ET (French only) – Register here
November 16, 2026 – 12-1 pm ET (English and French “drop-in” session) – Register here
Contact
Should you have any questions about eligibility or the application process, or would like to discuss your project idea, please feel welcome to reach out to the FaRM Agronomy Program Manager for your region:
Taryn Dickson
FaRM Agronomy Program Manager, Prairie Canada and BC
taryn@farmersforclimatesolutions.ca
Madeline Rodrigue
FaRM Agronomy Program Manager, Eastern Canada (ON, QC, and Atlantic Canada)
madeline@farmersforclimatesolutions.ca
Frequently asked questions
-
Yes. However, FaRM is unlikely to invite more than one project per applicant to proceed to the Full Proposal Stage or to ultimately receive funding. Applicants are therefore encouraged to focus on their strongest project concept and/or consult with a member of the FaRM team to determine which proposed project may be the best fit for the program.
-
Yes, provided they can demonstrate relevant on-farm research experience and knowledge-transfer or extension skills.
Successful applicants will be responsible for several project deliverables, including trial management, data collection, report writing, and planning and hosting an on-farm learning event. Working collaboratively can help distribute these responsibilities while also supporting the program’s goals of collaboration, peer learning, and building extension capacity.
The FaRM team is available to answer questions about the RFP process, as well as provide guidance as you develop your trial idea, experimental design, or refine methodology. However, we encourage farmers to draw on their own network to identify potential collaborators, including agronomists who work in their region.
-
The project must be inspired by a real barrier to adoption identified by a farmer or rancher partner, which must be clearly outlined in the LOI. At the LOI stage, any confirmed (or potential) producer partners should understand what participation in the trial would involve (hosting an on-farm event, sharing their observations in a Producers Perspective, and participating in a group reflection session).
However, we recognize that fall is a busy time on farms and that winter may provide more opportunity to refine trial and crop plans, confirm details with producer partners, and recruit additional producers to participate. Applicants invited to submit a Full Proposal must provide letters of support from participating farmers or ranchers.
-
FaRM aims to support trials that help farmers better account for and manage nitrogen from all sources. As such, applicants proposing a nitrogen management trial should be prepared to include a rough nitrogen budget at the Full Proposal stage that accounts for nitrogen from all relevant sources when determining treatment rates. A more detailed nitrogen budget will be required in the final report.
Trials examining enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs), such as polymer-coated urea, urease/nitrification inhibitors, must include reduced-rate treatments with and without the EEF to account for the expected increase in nitrogen use efficiency and help determine whether the EEF contributed to the observed response.
-
Yes, an agronomist may use their own active farm to conduct the trial if their farm earns the majority of its income from commercial farming rather than research-related activities. In addition to completing all other program deliverables, this individual would also be responsible for the Producer’s Perspective aspect of the Field Trial Report.
-
Yes, as long as all other eligibility criteria and deliverables are met, collaboration with other organizations (including stacking funding) is welcome. Partnerships can be especially helpful when hosting an on-farm event for knowledge sharing and can help amplify the results and experiences of the trial participants.
-
Yes, as long as you meet all of the FaRM Field Trial eligibility criteria. However, it is the applicant’s responsibility to confirm whether receiving FaRM funding may affect their eligibility for any other funding source(s).
-
Our goal is to let all successful Full Proposal applicants know by March 4, 2027, with contracts to follow shortly thereafter. Projects can start before March 4, 2027, but expenses incurred prior to this date are ineligible. Projects may start as late as fall 2027.
-
Yes. We welcome projects where multiple fields, trial sites, and participating farmers or ranchers have the potential to increase the relevance, reach, or potential impact of the trial.
A Producer’s Perspective and partial budget analysis will be required for each participating farmer and site, but only one on-farm learning event is required.
The maximum funding available remains up to $20,000 per project, with up to an additional $10,000 available for an eligible mentorship component.
-
The nature of on-farm trials means they do not always go according to plan. Extreme weather, crop failure, equipment issues, or other unforeseen circumstances may affect the trial or require adaptation. If challenges arise, participants should contact the FaRM team as soon as possible so we can work together to troubleshoot the issue and, where appropriate, make changes. Applicants are also encouraged to think about potential risks that may affect your trial and to develop strategies to try to minimize that risk.
Participants are still expected to document and report what happened and what was learned. Negative or inconclusive results can provide valuable information that can help farmers and agricultural professionals make more informed decisions about the BMP, as well as inform future FaRM Field Trials.
-
No, there is no preference for which BMPs (rotational grazing, cover cropping or nitrogen management) are addressed in the trial (as long as at least one is addressed).
FaRM Field Trials Review Committee
All FaRM Field Trials applications are reviewed by a group of agronomists, farmers, ranchers, and industry experts chosen for their knowledge and experience implementing nitrogen management, cover cropping, and rotational grazing. Together, these committee members review all field trial submissions, score them according to established criteria, provide feedback on how trials could be improved if selected, and make recommendations to FaRM Program staff about which trials they believe will provide the most benefit and value. Final decisions about which field trials selected for funding are made by FaRM Program staff. The following is a non-exhaustive list of reviewers who have participated; individual reviewers may not review every application.
Members ▼
- Terry Daynard; Grain Farmer and former crop science professor, University of Guelph; Ontario
- Norm Lamothe; Farmer and owner, Woodleigh Farms Ltd; Ontario
- Simon Lacombe; Agronome; Quebec
- Amy Sangster; Professional Agrologist; Nova Scotia
- Richard Tingskou; Professional Agrologist and Certified Crop Advisor; Newfoundland and Labrador
- Claudie Laflamme; Agronome; Quebec
- Ken Laing; Farmer and owner, Orchard Hill Farm; Ontario
- Dominique Dumas; Rancher and owner, À l’Herbe! Pasture Cattle; Quebec
- Marie-Eve Giroux; Agronome; Quebec
- Raquel Kolof; Farmer and owner, Hough Heritage Farm; British Columbia
- Mark Raymond; Certified Crop Advisor and Professional Agrologist; British Columbia
- Kerry Nell; Professional Agrologist and 4R Nutrient Management Specialist; Saskatchewan
- Tim Wray; Rancher and owner, Wray Ranch; Alberta
- Marc Vincent; Professional Agrologist, 4R Nutrient Management Specialist, Farmer and owner, Vincent farm; Manitoba
- Scott Mowbray; Farmer and farm owner; Manitoba
- Robert Hornford; Professional Agrologist and Certified Crop Advisor; Manitoba
- Patty Harris; Farmer and owner, Harris Ridge Farm; Manitoba
- Lee Sexton; Rancher and owner, Sexton Grazing and Consulting; Saskatchewan
